|
|
|
|
Welcome to Part I
Clinicals Page
To
acquire skills there is no alternative to practice.
You must get in to a habit of presenting to a senior psychiatrist, at least once a week. It is wise to start this well in advance of the exam. Always do your practice under strict exam conditions (as in your clinical practice you are doing this every day under uncontrolled conditions) and you can ask your examiner to be unsympathetic when marking you.
Read about history taking and examination in a good text (e.g. Oxford Textbook) until you
are familiar with all the techniques of clinical assessment. Apply these during your mock
practice.
It is important to have your own method of the order the headings under which you are
going to present. There are several in use. We find the following order useful as it forms
a logical sequence to organise the information and helps to tell a story.
Always mention the heading or the subheading of the history or the MSE to the examiners
before you present the corresponding findings.
History
Introduction
e.g. My patient is, Mr A a 36 yr. old school teacher, from Edmonton, who was admitted to
ward B on the 3rd of March 1999 informally, but is currently detained under section
3 of the Mental health act 1983.
Presenting Complaint
Presenting complaint/s and the duration.
History of the presenting complaint
This would include the sequence of events leading to the admission or
presentation. Don't forget to mention the risks of self harm and suicide and of harming
any body else. Associated somatic symptoms, the treatment and other help the patient has
had so far and their effects would also be appropriate to be mentioned under this heading.
Family History
Doesn't quite sound appropriate to be included here but this part of the history
is very important, and is therefore better to be mentioned at the outset itself. Don't
forget to look for similar problems to those of the patient in the family (e.g. alcohol,
criminality, or personality problems etc.)
Past Psychiatric History
Better to mention this before it is too late so that examiners will be able to
put the parts of the story together. Mention about what happened from the onset of the
illness, about past treatment etc. Find out what happened in between relapses (e.g.
completely well / maintained on treatment or not etc.) Don't forget to mention about past
attempts of suicide or harm to self or others.
Past Medical History
Ask about physical illness that may be causative or otherwise associated with the
patients psychiatric problem. Inquire about physical effects of self poisoning or alcohol
and drug abuse and be ready to mention important negative findings. It is important to
remember the past medical history when you physically examine the patient so that you can
concentrate on important relevant aspects.
Personal History
Personal History
This would include
Childhood and Schooling
Occupational History and Financial Circumstances
Marital and Psychosexual History
Home Circumstance
Forensic History
Alcohol and Drug History
Premorbid personality
A good question to start questioning about premorbid personality is to ask,
"If I were to ask your friends about what sort of a person you were before you fell
ill, how do you think they would have answered"? Mention about the intermorbid
personality as well and find out what has happened to the personality over the time
Mental State Examination
Here again, there are different methods of ordering your headings
Following is acceptable to most psychiatrists.
General Appearance
You may want to include details about the dress, eye contact and rapport,
abnormal movements e.g. responding to hallucinations, other motor abnormalities such as
TD, abnormal postures under this heading. If the patient is on medication you may mention
about the presence or absence of EPSE, and other obvious anticholinergic side
effects.(e.g. dry mouth)
Speech
It is common for you to be able to say that your patients speech is spontaneous,
coherent without formal thought disorder. However if there are abnormalities (e.g. reduced
amount, slowness, low volume, pressure of speech etc.) you will not have this luxury and
will have to explain them.
Mood
This can be explained under following sub headings
Main mood (Depression, or Mania)
Subjective(patients) and objective(your) appraisal
Other associated moods (
Affect (labile, flat, blunt or reactive and congruent/incongruent)
Associated cognitions (e.g. depressive: guilt, life not worth living, self blame, pessimism regarding the future, ideas of suicide or DSH / anxious: about going mad, having a heart attack, or collapsing and other catastrophes)
Thought content
This includes
Delusions (challenge them to see how fixed they are. Don't commit yourself to the
type (primary / secondary) if you are not absolutely sure.)
Overvalued ideas
Phobias
Obsessions
Perceptual abnormalities
Would include
Hallucinations
Pseudo Hallucinations
Illusions
Misperceptions
Cognition
To what extent you carry out the cognitive state examination will depend on the
patient you get on the day, and if you have no reason to suspect cognitive problems
following will be adequate to mention. Otherwise you may have to do a MMSE or even extend
the examination beyond that.
Orientation in time place and person
Memory, both registration (immediate), and recall (five minutes)
Concentration
Insight
Find out following points
Does the patient thinks that he is ill, if so is it mental? Can it be helped and will the
patient require / accept treatment or what the patient thinks about detention? (if
relevant) What does the patient thinks about the effect the illness has had, on self
and others?
Physical examination
Don't forget to mention this even if there are no positive findings. Try look
for relevant findings, related to the psychiatric and medical history.
Cognitive State Examination
If the patient is an elderly, or there is suspicion of cognitive impairment,
a more comprehensive assessment of cognition is essential.
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) by Folstein and colleagues is a common one in use as
a screening test for dementia and delerium. However, it does not test long-term memory.
Therefore you may have to extend it (e.g. ask, dates of 2nd World War, name of prime
minister or monarch, any recent items of news or current affairs)
MMSE is not useful for detecting focal cognitive lesions and is insensitive to frontal
lobe pathology, therefore you may also concentrate on these aspects in your assessment
(e.g. history of partial epilepsy, or strokes involving a side, Luria's motor test, or
other focal neurological signs on physical examination, cognitive estimates or verbal
fluency in mental state etc)
The Mini Mental State Examination
Conventionally cut-off point is 24 out of 30 (for elderly, and it has to be
adjusted upwards for the young and educated)
Orientation to time (5 points)
Ask the : day, date, month,
Orientation to Place (5 points)
Ask the : country, county, town / city, place, and floor (what floor are we on?)
Memory (registration) (3 points)
apple, penny, table (say, "I am going to name three objects. After I have finished
saying their names I want you to repeat them after me")
Attention and concentration (5 points)
Serial sevens or threes / or spell 'world' backwards
Memory (recall) (3 points)
Ask the three objects you asked to repeat a few minutes ago?
Expressive Language (naming) (2 points)
Ask what they are (show pen or pencil and a wristwatch)
Expressive Language (repetition) (1 point)
No ifs, ands, or buts (say, "listen carefully as I am about to say something which I
would like you to repeat after me")
Language (reading and comprehension) (1 point if obeyed)
(Show sheet with 'Close your eyes' printed on it)
"Can you do what it says"?
Praxis (ideational) (3 points)
Paper folding (say, "I am going to give you a piece of paper. When I give it to you,
take the paper in your right hand. Fold the paper in half with both hands and put the
paper down on your lap")
Praxis (copying and drawing) (1 point)
Double pentagons
The patient should be shown the design on the MMSE sheet and asked to copy it.
Praxis (spontaneous writing) (1 point for a sentence with a noun and a verb)
Ask the patient to write a complete sentence
TOTAL (maximum score 30)
At the exam it is important to orientate the patient about what is going on, at the beginning itself. Mention that you may have to interrupt due to time restraints. Telling the patient that you will have to probably ask some questions, you have already asked, when you go in front of the examiners, and as it is generally not a reclarification of what is already asked (and is mainly a matter of showing examiners how you interact with the patient) the patient can give the same answers that has already been given, is good practice. (helps some patients to overcome confusion).
It is important to have enough time for thinking about the case as this is very important.
Have the patient by your side while you do this and clarify if something is not clear.
Practice formulating cases over and over again so that you don't have to struggle with it
on the day when you are under pressure. If you try to remember the salient points during
the assessment, this will be easier but don't forget that formulation is not a summary,
and therefore not a repetition of your assessment.
Examiners will not ask you for a formulation, but will ask you questions which you can
easily answer if you have done this exercise. (an examiner once asked the candidate to
present the history, MSE, Diagnosis and the DD, reasons for and against the diagnoses, and
aetiology during the candidates presentation itself. (an easy exercise if the candidate
has done the formulation)
Following is a suggested method for formulation.
Introduction
(e.g. Mrs Mary Smith is presenting with a H/O .............................. .
Diagnosis / Differential Diagnosis (work out the DD by applying the diagnostic
hierarchy, and process of exclusion)
(Diagnostic Hierarchy [top diagnoses trumps lower ones]
Organic illness, Epilepsy, Drug and Alcohol induced illness
Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
Affective disorders
Neurotic illness, Eating disorders, PTSD, Somatisation
Personality disorders
Personality traits)
Reasons for and against each diagnosis.
Aetiology
Consider Physical, Psychological, and Social causes, and cross tabulate these with
predisposition, precipitation and maintenance. (try to throw some theoretical knowledge
here, e.g. vulnerability factors for depression, high EE family, treatment with anti
depressants leading to mania etc.)
Investigations
Consider again under Physical, Psychological, and Social headings.
(Management
Once again consider Physical, Psychological, and Social management in the context of
short, medium and long term. (remember, Multi disciplinary assessment, followed by Multi
disciplinary management)
Prognosis
In the short term and in the long term. Always be ready to justify what you say, by giving
reasons?)(italics-not necessary for part I, exam)
Other important points
Have your own
Have a plan for asking questions in front of the examiners under each subheading of the
mental state examination (This is different to what you would do with the patient when you
take your history and do the MSE, e.g. you will have to ask about associated somatic
symptoms, and psychotic symptoms etc, if you were asked to elicit the mood)
Know the common theory questions that can be asked and the answers . (e.g. Definitions of
psychopathological terms, Few key papers of evidence, that you can throw such as Brown and
Harris's vulnerability factors, and Vaughn and Leff's EE.)
Know the ICD 10 well as most examiners won't know it that well. You may have to tell the
examiners that your diagnosis according to ICD 10 is for e.g. depressive disorder severe
in intensity with psychotic symptoms, so that he knows why you are talking in a different
language. (that is difficult for him to understand)
Knowing the PSE definition of common symptoms can help. (e.g. If you say that according to
the PSE, pseudo hallucinations mean hallucinations occurring in the head , examiners won't
argue with you)
Know your phenomenology well, (and management for part II).
Don't mention anything you don't know as you may be asked to explain it. (e.g. a candidate
was asked what he meant by overvalued ideas, because he mentioned it, and unluckily he
didn't have a clear idea as to what it was.)